Rebels of science

The Fate of a theory

“The solution spaces of minimal surfaces have a significant role in determining the relations between topological and physical entities. It is no coincidence that whenever a physical law confronts a wall that has never been recognized before, mathematics and topology come to the rescue to keep the laws intact. That shows the pure understanding of the relations between “things” seems to be the ultimate clue of what's beyond.”

See the fate of a theory argument of mine to get an overall idea;

Felsefe serisi - Short reviews on philosophy and philosophy of science (burakcemcoskun.blogspot.com)

 

POP-OUT

Constraints and restrictions move physics forward. The breakthroughs are not usually successive end points of life-long research of well-established subjects, instead, are mysterious and law-breaking pop-ups. It would also be unfair to suggest that these pop-ups are nothing but coincidences.

 

Physicist ?

“Recently, there has been a widely discussed, relatively violent approach to the people who consider themselves “physicists of some kind”. Apart from the charlatans who hope to alter the public view and ultimately make a living by fooling themselves or the worst; not educated in basic, fundamental concepts or conduct any work in any field of physics, if someone constantly thinking about the physics and the laws of nature, creates arguments based on their calculations and their knowledge of fundamental physics, aware of the current experimental and observational techniques required by the current era, has sufficient enough background on fundamental subjects and conducted several works on various subjects, constantly in an environment of discussions and seminars with the colleagues, can be considered as a physicist. It was enough to be a phusi-o logos and just think about nature nearly two thousand years ago, however, the current system can not allow this kind of relaxation. That would be the Ionian dream that everyone in the physics community is too afraid to fall into. The common misconception of the foolish desire for a requirement of a fact-checking community of academia mostly needs the ones who can go with the flow. Many of the rebels in these communities and the ancient phusiologos' have shown all this progress and breakthroughs in science and technology can only be meaningful if we built a real system of “understanding things”. Self-satisfaction with personal egos and foolish dreams resulted in an agglomeration in science where amazing breakthroughs happen often, however, only 10 % of the community is ever cited or mentioned. Their work is mostly useless and ignored and has never been seen as relevant while slowly dissolving into nothingness.”

 

REBELS OF SCIENCE

·      EUDOXUS

·      ANAXIMANDROS

·      PROTOGORAS

·      Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

·      Pierre de Fermat

·      Francis Bacon

·      Niels Bohr

·      Lee Smolin

·      Paul Feyerabend

·      Freeman Dyson